Montenegro vs Republic of Korea: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Montenegro
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 0.4114 kg/ha against 0.3974 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 0.014 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 78th and Republic of Korea ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8294 kg/ha | 0.324 kg/ha | 0.5054 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.1155 kg/ha | 0.3394 kg/ha | 0.2239 kg/ha | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 0.5934 kg/ha | 0.3899 kg/ha | 0.2035 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Montenegro or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 0.4114 kg/ha against 0.3974 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Montenegro and Republic of Korea?
- 0.014 kg/ha, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Republic of Korea?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Republic of Korea rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Montenegro ranks 78th and Republic of Korea ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).