Myanmar vs Rwanda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Myanmar
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.8438 kg/ha against 0.8292 kg/ha in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0146 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Myanmar ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5892 kg/ha | 0.9742 kg/ha | 0.385 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0.6195 kg/ha | 0.8202 kg/ha | 0.2007 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0.623 kg/ha | 0.7491 kg/ha | 0.1262 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 0.711 kg/ha | 0.7127 kg/ha | 0.0017 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.8531 kg/ha | 0.9211 kg/ha | 0.0679 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.8577 kg/ha | 0.7124 kg/ha | 0.1453 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 0.8331 kg/ha | 0.8111 kg/ha | 0.0221 kg/ha | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Myanmar or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.8438 kg/ha against 0.8292 kg/ha in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Myanmar and Rwanda?
- 0.0146 kg/ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Rwanda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Myanmar ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).