Nepal vs Ukraine: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area

Nepal
1.28 kg/ha
in 2023
Ukraine
1.31 kg/ha
in 2023
Nepal rank
11th
Ukraine rank
9th

Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Nepal
  • Ukraine
0.250.50.7511.21.5196119922023

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 1.31 kg/ha against 1.28 kg/ha in Nepal, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.

Nepal ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 9th of 201 countries.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6828 kg/ha 1.2 kg/ha 0.5172 kg/ha Ukraine
2000s 0.8518 kg/ha 1.27 kg/ha 0.4189 kg/ha Ukraine
2010s 1.12 kg/ha 1.4 kg/ha 0.2843 kg/ha Ukraine
2020s 1.27 kg/ha 1.33 kg/ha 0.0663 kg/ha Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Nepal or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 1.31 kg/ha against 1.28 kg/ha in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Nepal and Ukraine?
0.03 kg/ha, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Ukraine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Ukraine rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
Nepal ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 9th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).