North Macedonia vs Peru: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- North Macedonia
- Peru
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.6815 kg/ha against 0.6549 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 0.0266 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 49th and Peru ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6278 kg/ha | 0.5141 kg/ha | 0.1137 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 0.7839 kg/ha | 0.7842 kg/ha | 0.0003 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.7568 kg/ha | 0.7177 kg/ha | 0.0391 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.6836 kg/ha | 0.6823 kg/ha | 0.0013 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, North Macedonia or Peru?
- North Macedonia, at 0.6815 kg/ha against 0.6549 kg/ha in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between North Macedonia and Peru?
- 0.0266 kg/ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Peru?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Peru rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- North Macedonia ranks 49th and Peru ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).