Panama vs Vanuatu: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Panama
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 0.1059 kg/ha against 0.1023 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 0.0036 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 152nd and Vanuatu ranks 151st of 201 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1109 kg/ha | 0.079 kg/ha | 0.0319 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1970s | 0.1103 kg/ha | 0.0736 kg/ha | 0.0367 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1980s | 0.1629 kg/ha | 0.0794 kg/ha | 0.0835 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1990s | 0.1197 kg/ha | 0.0649 kg/ha | 0.0548 kg/ha | Panama |
| 2000s | 0.1054 kg/ha | 0.0483 kg/ha | 0.057 kg/ha | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.1357 kg/ha | 0.0742 kg/ha | 0.0615 kg/ha | Panama |
| 2020s | 0.1448 kg/ha | 0.0868 kg/ha | 0.058 kg/ha | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Panama or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 0.1059 kg/ha against 0.1023 kg/ha in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Panama and Vanuatu?
- 0.0036 kg/ha, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Vanuatu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Vanuatu rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Panama ranks 152nd and Vanuatu ranks 151st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).