Peru vs Yugoslav SFR: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Peru
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 0.6791 kg/ha against 0.6549 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 0.0242 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 52nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 50th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Yugoslav SFR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9137 kg/ha | 0.9054 kg/ha | 0.0083 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 0.62 kg/ha | 0.8362 kg/ha | 0.2162 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 0.4982 kg/ha | 0.7921 kg/ha | 0.2939 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 0.3959 kg/ha | 0.7389 kg/ha | 0.343 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Peru or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 0.6791 kg/ha against 0.6549 kg/ha in Peru as of 1991.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Peru and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.0242 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Peru and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Peru ranks 52nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 50th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).