Small island developing States (SIDS) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area

Small island developing States (SIDS)
0.1634 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
0.2646 kg/ha
in 2023
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
15th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th

Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.2646 kg/ha against 0.1634 kg/ha in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 0.1012 kg/ha.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.6 times Small island developing States (SIDS)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 18 groups.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small island developing States (SIDS) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1472 kg/ha 0.1995 kg/ha 0.0522 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 0.1239 kg/ha 0.2034 kg/ha 0.0796 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 0.1215 kg/ha 0.2052 kg/ha 0.0837 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 0.1112 kg/ha 0.2118 kg/ha 0.1005 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 0.112 kg/ha 0.2497 kg/ha 0.1377 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 0.1529 kg/ha 0.3226 kg/ha 0.1697 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 0.1643 kg/ha 0.2745 kg/ha 0.1102 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Small island developing States (SIDS) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.2646 kg/ha against 0.1634 kg/ha in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Small island developing States (SIDS) and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.1012 kg/ha, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small island developing States (SIDS) and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Small island developing States (SIDS) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 18 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small island developing States (SIDS) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/small-island-developing-states-sids/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/small-island-developing-states-sids/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Small island developing States (SIDS) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).