Spain vs Thailand: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Spain
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 0.2946 kg/ha against 0.284 kg/ha in Spain, a difference of 0.0106 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Thailand ahead.
Spain ranks 103rd and Thailand ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3839 kg/ha | 0.3687 kg/ha | 0.0152 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1970s | 0.4271 kg/ha | 0.318 kg/ha | 0.1091 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1980s | 0.4452 kg/ha | 0.2863 kg/ha | 0.1589 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1990s | 0.4249 kg/ha | 0.2616 kg/ha | 0.1633 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 0.4925 kg/ha | 0.256 kg/ha | 0.2364 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 0.4914 kg/ha | 0.2534 kg/ha | 0.238 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 0.3812 kg/ha | 0.2767 kg/ha | 0.1045 kg/ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Spain or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 0.2946 kg/ha against 0.284 kg/ha in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Spain and Thailand?
- 0.0106 kg/ha, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Thailand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Spain and Thailand rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Spain ranks 103rd and Thailand ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).