Spain vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Spain
- Uruguay
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0.284 kg/ha against 0.2819 kg/ha in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0021 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 105th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3839 kg/ha | 0.3071 kg/ha | 0.0768 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1970s | 0.4271 kg/ha | 0.3699 kg/ha | 0.0573 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1980s | 0.4452 kg/ha | 0.3347 kg/ha | 0.1105 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1990s | 0.4249 kg/ha | 0.2933 kg/ha | 0.1316 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 0.4925 kg/ha | 0.47 kg/ha | 0.0225 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 0.4914 kg/ha | 0.6636 kg/ha | 0.1723 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.3812 kg/ha | 0.505 kg/ha | 0.1238 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Spain or Uruguay?
- Spain, at 0.284 kg/ha against 0.2819 kg/ha in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Spain and Uruguay?
- 0.0021 kg/ha, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Spain and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Spain ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 105th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).