Sudan vs Tonga: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area

Sudan
0.0581 kg/ha
in 2023
Tonga
0.0606 kg/ha
in 2023
Sudan rank
169th
Tonga rank
168th

Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Sudan
  • Tonga
0.0250.050.0750.10.1250.15196119922023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 0.0606 kg/ha against 0.0581 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.0025 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tonga ahead.

Sudan ranks 169th and Tonga ranks 168th of 201 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Tonga Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0458 kg/ha 0.0788 kg/ha 0.033 kg/ha Tonga
2020s 0.0598 kg/ha 0.0586 kg/ha 0.0011 kg/ha Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Sudan or Tonga?
Tonga, at 0.0606 kg/ha against 0.0581 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Sudan and Tonga?
0.0025 kg/ha, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tonga?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Tonga rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
Sudan ranks 169th and Tonga ranks 168th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).