Tonga vs Tunisia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Tonga
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.0614 kg/ha against 0.0606 kg/ha in Tonga, a difference of 0.0008 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.
Tonga ranks 168th and Tunisia ranks 167th of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0906 kg/ha | 0.1537 kg/ha | 0.0631 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 0.0874 kg/ha | 0.1648 kg/ha | 0.0773 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 0.0552 kg/ha | 0.1668 kg/ha | 0.1116 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 0.0404 kg/ha | 0.1662 kg/ha | 0.1258 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.0854 kg/ha | 0.1522 kg/ha | 0.0668 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.0895 kg/ha | 0.1483 kg/ha | 0.0589 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.0586 kg/ha | 0.085 kg/ha | 0.0264 kg/ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Tonga or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.0614 kg/ha against 0.0606 kg/ha in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Tonga and Tunisia?
- 0.0008 kg/ha, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Tonga and Tunisia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Tonga ranks 168th and Tunisia ranks 167th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).