Albania vs Georgia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Albania
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 355.5 t against 325.59 t in Albania, a difference of 29.91 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 117th and Georgia ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 506.96 t | 624.14 t | 117.18 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 360.57 t | 797.45 t | 436.89 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 326.32 t | 379.23 t | 52.91 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 317.31 t | 347.39 t | 30.08 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Albania or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 355.5 t against 325.59 t in Albania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Albania and Georgia?
- 29.91 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Albania and Georgia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Albania ranks 117th and Georgia ranks 114th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).