Americas vs Ukraine: Seed — Cropland potassium

Americas
181,220 t
in 2023
Ukraine
44,342 t
in 2023
Americas rank
5th
Ukraine rank
8th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Americas
  • Ukraine
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Americas currently reports 181,220 t against 44,342 t in Ukraine, a difference of 136,878 t.

That makes Americas's figure about 4.1 times Ukraine's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Americas has been ahead every year.

Americas ranks 5th and Ukraine ranks 8th of 32 groups.

Americas has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Americas Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 135,700 t 41,009 t 94,692 t Americas
2000s 155,059 t 42,435 t 112,623 t Americas
2010s 183,467 t 47,133 t 136,334 t Americas
2020s 186,158 t 44,976 t 141,182 t Americas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Americas or Ukraine?
Americas, at 181,220 t against 44,342 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Americas and Ukraine?
136,878 t, with Americas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and Ukraine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Americas and Ukraine rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Americas ranks 5th and Ukraine ranks 8th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).