Angola vs Hungary: Seed — Cropland potassium

Angola
2,113 t
in 2023
Hungary
2,037 t
in 2023
Angola rank
57th
Hungary rank
60th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Angola
  • Hungary
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 2,113 t against 2,037 t in Hungary, a difference of 76 t.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Angola ranks 57th and Hungary ranks 60th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Hungary Difference Ahead
1960s 361.72 t 5,778 t 5,416 t Hungary
1970s 411.18 t 4,682 t 4,271 t Hungary
1980s 331.14 t 4,445 t 4,114 t Hungary
1990s 354.25 t 3,394 t 3,039 t Hungary
2000s 1,236 t 2,207 t 970.75 t Hungary
2010s 2,576 t 2,457 t 119.06 t Angola
2020s 2,121 t 2,176 t 55.63 t Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Angola or Hungary?
Angola, at 2,113 t against 2,037 t in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Angola and Hungary?
76 t, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Hungary?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Hungary rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Angola ranks 57th and Hungary ranks 60th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).