Antigua and Barbuda vs Guadeloupe: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 0.041 t against 0.0163 t in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0247 t.
That makes Guadeloupe's figure about 2.5 times Antigua and Barbuda's.
Across all 46 years both countries report, Guadeloupe has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 172nd and Guadeloupe ranks 171st of 185 countries.
Guadeloupe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0319 t | 0.2053 t | 0.1734 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 0.0353 t | 0.4163 t | 0.381 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 0.0158 t | 0.2589 t | 0.2432 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 0.0148 t | 0.1535 t | 0.1387 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 0.0145 t | 0.0695 t | 0.055 t | Guadeloupe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Antigua and Barbuda or Guadeloupe?
- Guadeloupe, at 0.041 t against 0.0163 t in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2006.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Antigua and Barbuda and Guadeloupe?
- 0.0247 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Guadeloupe?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Guadeloupe rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 172nd and Guadeloupe ranks 171st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).