Antigua and Barbuda vs Tuvalu: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 0.0587 t against 0.0163 t in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0424 t.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 3.6 times Antigua and Barbuda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 188th and Tuvalu ranks 185th of 201 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0319 t | 0.0968 t | 0.0648 t | Tuvalu |
| 1970s | 0.0353 t | 0.0683 t | 0.033 t | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 0.0158 t | 0.0712 t | 0.0554 t | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 0.0148 t | 0.0485 t | 0.0337 t | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 0.0147 t | 0.0444 t | 0.0297 t | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 0.0164 t | 0.0454 t | 0.029 t | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 0.0163 t | 0.0628 t | 0.0465 t | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Antigua and Barbuda or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 0.0587 t against 0.0163 t in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Antigua and Barbuda and Tuvalu?
- 0.0424 t, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Tuvalu rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 188th and Tuvalu ranks 185th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).