Argentina vs Eastern Asia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Argentina
- Eastern Asia
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 118,811 t against 17,829 t in Argentina, a difference of 100,982 t.
That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 6.7 times Argentina's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 10th and Eastern Asia ranks 9th of 201 countries.
Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Eastern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,056 t | 117,770 t | 109,714 t | Eastern Asia |
| 1970s | 8,113 t | 115,531 t | 107,417 t | Eastern Asia |
| 1980s | 9,697 t | 118,886 t | 109,189 t | Eastern Asia |
| 1990s | 12,665 t | 122,633 t | 109,967 t | Eastern Asia |
| 2000s | 19,659 t | 120,218 t | 100,560 t | Eastern Asia |
| 2010s | 28,694 t | 114,406 t | 85,713 t | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 25,197 t | 119,206 t | 94,008 t | Eastern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Argentina or Eastern Asia?
- Eastern Asia, at 118,811 t against 17,829 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Argentina and Eastern Asia?
- 100,982 t, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Eastern Asia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Eastern Asia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Eastern Asia ranks 9th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).