Armenia vs El Salvador: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Armenia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 589.17 t against 508.06 t in El Salvador, a difference of 81.11 t.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 90th and El Salvador ranks 93rd of 185 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 836.5 t | 290.54 t | 545.95 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 940.59 t | 364.34 t | 576.25 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 831.87 t | 536.69 t | 295.18 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 603.49 t | 518.95 t | 84.54 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Armenia or El Salvador?
- Armenia, at 589.17 t against 508.06 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Armenia and El Salvador?
- 81.11 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and El Salvador?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and El Salvador rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Armenia ranks 90th and El Salvador ranks 93rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).