Armenia vs Sri Lanka: Seed — Cropland potassium

Armenia
589.17 t
in 2023
Sri Lanka
547.24 t
in 2023
Armenia rank
101st
Sri Lanka rank
103rd

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Armenia
  • Sri Lanka
02505007501.0k196119922023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 589.17 t against 547.24 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 41.93 t.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 201 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 836.5 t 643.83 t 192.66 t Armenia
2000s 940.59 t 633.86 t 306.73 t Armenia
2010s 831.87 t 604.08 t 227.79 t Armenia
2020s 603.49 t 565.14 t 38.34 t Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Armenia or Sri Lanka?
Armenia, at 589.17 t against 547.24 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Armenia and Sri Lanka?
41.93 t, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Sri Lanka?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Sri Lanka rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Armenia ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).