Armenia vs Zimbabwe: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Armenia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 589.17 t against 583.65 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 5.52 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 836.5 t | 781.71 t | 54.78 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 940.59 t | 836.34 t | 104.25 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 831.87 t | 527.31 t | 304.56 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 603.49 t | 598.16 t | 5.32 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Armenia or Zimbabwe?
- Armenia, at 589.17 t against 583.65 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Armenia and Zimbabwe?
- 5.52 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Zimbabwe rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Armenia ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).