Australia and New Zealand vs Oceania: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 6,944 t against 6,874 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 70 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Oceania ranks 24th of 186 countries.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,150 t | 4,183 t | 32.99 t | Oceania |
| 1970s | 4,990 t | 5,025 t | 35.16 t | Oceania |
| 1980s | 7,264 t | 7,303 t | 39.4 t | Oceania |
| 1990s | 6,368 t | 6,407 t | 38.53 t | Oceania |
| 2000s | 7,007 t | 7,049 t | 41.3 t | Oceania |
| 2010s | 6,732 t | 6,792 t | 59.64 t | Oceania |
| 2020s | 6,373 t | 6,441 t | 68.06 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Australia and New Zealand or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 6,944 t against 6,874 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Australia and New Zealand and Oceania?
- 70 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Oceania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Oceania rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Oceania ranks 24th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).