Austria vs Latvia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Austria
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1,197 t against 912.99 t in Austria, a difference of 284.01 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Austria's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 75th of 186 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,064 t | 2,326 t | 1,261 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 969.22 t | 1,541 t | 571.47 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 965.65 t | 1,426 t | 459.97 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 949.02 t | 1,249 t | 300.3 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Austria or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 1,197 t against 912.99 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Austria and Latvia?
- 284.01 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Latvia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Austria ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 75th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).