Austria vs Slovakia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Austria
- Slovakia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 912.99 t against 815.33 t in Slovakia, a difference of 97.66 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 78th and Slovakia ranks 81st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,046 t | 885.3 t | 161.08 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 969.22 t | 980.04 t | 10.82 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 965.65 t | 898.35 t | 67.3 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 949.02 t | 904.3 t | 44.72 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Austria or Slovakia?
- Austria, at 912.99 t against 815.33 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Austria and Slovakia?
- 97.66 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Slovakia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Austria ranks 78th and Slovakia ranks 81st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).