Azerbaijan vs Benin: Seed — Cropland potassium

Azerbaijan
2,181 t
in 2023
Benin
2,489 t
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
55th
Benin rank
52nd

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Benin
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Benin currently reports 2,489 t against 2,181 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 308 t.

That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Benin ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 55th and Benin ranks 52nd of 201 countries.

Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Benin Difference Ahead
1990s 989.65 t 1,852 t 861.97 t Benin
2000s 2,025 t 2,334 t 309.04 t Benin
2010s 2,287 t 2,489 t 202.01 t Benin
2020s 2,270 t 2,489 t 218.51 t Benin

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Azerbaijan or Benin?
Benin, at 2,489 t against 2,181 t in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Azerbaijan and Benin?
308 t, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Benin?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Benin rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Azerbaijan ranks 55th and Benin ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).