Azerbaijan vs Greece: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Azerbaijan
- Greece
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 2,181 t against 2,125 t in Greece, a difference of 56 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Greece ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 47th and Greece ranks 48th of 186 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 989.65 t | 3,376 t | 2,386 t | Greece |
| 2000s | 2,025 t | 2,964 t | 938.3 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 2,287 t | 2,404 t | 117.16 t | Greece |
| 2020s | 2,270 t | 2,513 t | 242.83 t | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Azerbaijan or Greece?
- Azerbaijan, at 2,181 t against 2,125 t in Greece as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Azerbaijan and Greece?
- 56 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Greece?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Greece rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Azerbaijan ranks 47th and Greece ranks 48th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).