Bahrain vs Iceland: Seed — Cropland potassium

Bahrain
0.0018 t
in 2023
Iceland
0.0018 t
in 2023
Bahrain rank
193rd
Iceland rank
193rd

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Bahrain
  • Iceland
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 0.0018 t against 0.0018 t in Iceland, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Bahrain ranks 193rd and Iceland ranks 193rd of 201 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0018 t 4.43 t 4.43 t Iceland
1970s 0.0018 t 5.7 t 5.7 t Iceland
1980s 0.0018 t 5.7 t 5.7 t Iceland
1990s 0.0018 t 6.27 t 6.27 t Iceland
2000s 0.0018 t 5.7 t 5.7 t Iceland
2010s 0.0018 t 0.5707 t 0.5689 t Iceland
2020s 0.0018 t 0.0018 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Bahrain or Iceland?
Bahrain, at 0.0018 t against 0.0018 t in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Bahrain and Iceland?
0 t, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahrain and Iceland rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Bahrain ranks 193rd and Iceland ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).