Bangladesh vs Belarus: Seed — Cropland potassium

Bangladesh
8,509 t
in 2023
Belarus
8,385 t
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
19th
Belarus rank
20th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Belarus
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 8,509 t against 8,385 t in Belarus, a difference of 124 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 19th and Belarus ranks 20th of 201 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 7,080 t 18,491 t 11,410 t Belarus
2000s 7,932 t 13,174 t 5,242 t Belarus
2010s 7,540 t 11,666 t 4,126 t Belarus
2020s 8,337 t 8,358 t 21.66 t Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Bangladesh or Belarus?
Bangladesh, at 8,509 t against 8,385 t in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Bangladesh and Belarus?
124 t, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Belarus rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Bangladesh ranks 19th and Belarus ranks 20th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).