Bangladesh vs Central Asia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Bangladesh
- Central Asia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 25,141 t against 8,509 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 16,632 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 3.0 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 18th and Central Asia ranks 12th of 185 countries.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Central Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,956 t | 26,469 t | 20,513 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 6,363 t | 28,765 t | 22,403 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 6,818 t | 28,037 t | 21,218 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 7,037 t | 23,344 t | 16,307 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 7,932 t | 21,307 t | 13,375 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 7,540 t | 26,484 t | 18,944 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 8,337 t | 25,598 t | 17,262 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Bangladesh or Central Asia?
- Central Asia, at 25,141 t against 8,509 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Bangladesh and Central Asia?
- 16,632 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Central Asia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Central Asia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Bangladesh ranks 18th and Central Asia ranks 12th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).