Barbados vs Qatar: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Barbados
- Qatar
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0.0018 t against 0.0018 t in Qatar, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 193rd and Qatar ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0.0018 t | 0.0018 t | Qatar |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0.0018 t | 0.0018 t | Qatar |
| 1980s | 0.0005 t | 0.0018 t | 0.0013 t | Qatar |
| 1990s | 0.0018 t | 0.0018 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | 0.0018 t | 0.0018 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0.0018 t | 0.0018 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0.0018 t | 0.0022 t | 0.0004 t | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Barbados or Qatar?
- Barbados, at 0.0018 t against 0.0018 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Barbados and Qatar?
- 0 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Qatar rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Barbados ranks 193rd and Qatar ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).