Belarus vs Romania: Seed — Cropland potassium

Belarus
8,385 t
in 2023
Romania
9,121 t
in 2023
Belarus rank
20th
Romania rank
17th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Belarus
  • Romania
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 9,121 t against 8,385 t in Belarus, a difference of 736 t.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 20th and Romania ranks 17th of 201 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 18,491 t 10,636 t 7,855 t Belarus
2000s 13,174 t 9,266 t 3,907 t Belarus
2010s 11,666 t 8,920 t 2,745 t Belarus
2020s 8,358 t 7,930 t 427.93 t Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Belarus or Romania?
Romania, at 9,121 t against 8,385 t in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Belarus and Romania?
736 t, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Romania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Romania rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Belarus ranks 20th and Romania ranks 17th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).