Belgium-Luxembourg vs Nicaragua: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 777.97 t against 694.84 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 83.13 t.
That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 83rd and Nicaragua ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,091 t | 703.55 t | 387.43 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 745.24 t | 733.38 t | 11.87 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 625.75 t | 696.05 t | 70.3 t | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 710.97 t | 702.02 t | 8.95 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Belgium-Luxembourg or Nicaragua?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 777.97 t against 694.84 t in Nicaragua as of 1999.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Belgium-Luxembourg and Nicaragua?
- 83.13 t, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Nicaragua?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Nicaragua rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 83rd and Nicaragua ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).