Belgium vs Slovakia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 815.33 t against 794.58 t in Belgium, a difference of 20.75 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Slovakia ahead.
Belgium ranks 93rd and Slovakia ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 775.57 t | 980.04 t | 204.46 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 742.65 t | 898.35 t | 155.7 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 767.87 t | 904.3 t | 136.43 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Belgium or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 815.33 t against 794.58 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Belgium and Slovakia?
- 20.75 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Slovakia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Slovakia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 93rd and Slovakia ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).