Belgium vs Sudan (former): Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 794.58 t against 705.65 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 88.93 t.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 93rd and Sudan (former) ranks 96th of 201 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 775.57 t | 669.25 t | 106.33 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 734.81 t | 681 t | 53.82 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Belgium or Sudan (former)?
- Belgium, at 794.58 t against 705.65 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Belgium and Sudan (former)?
- 88.93 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sudan (former)?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Belgium and Sudan (former) rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 93rd and Sudan (former) ranks 96th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).