Belize vs Solomon Islands: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Belize
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 18.82 t against 12.06 t in Belize, a difference of 6.76 t.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.6 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Belize ranks 161st and Solomon Islands ranks 158th of 201 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 5.31 t | 5.31 t | Solomon Islands |
| 1970s | 0 t | 6.97 t | 6.97 t | Solomon Islands |
| 1980s | 0 t | 10.6 t | 10.6 t | Solomon Islands |
| 1990s | 0.3851 t | 12.57 t | 12.19 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 0.7718 t | 16.43 t | 15.66 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 15.02 t | 15.8 t | 0.779 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 10.2 t | 18.28 t | 8.08 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Belize or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 18.82 t against 12.06 t in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Belize and Solomon Islands?
- 6.76 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Solomon Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Solomon Islands rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Belize ranks 161st and Solomon Islands ranks 158th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).