Benin vs Ethiopia PDR: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Benin
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Benin currently reports 2,489 t against 2,299 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 190 t.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 52nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 745 t | 2,491 t | 1,746 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 717.12 t | 2,428 t | 1,711 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 1,058 t | 2,457 t | 1,399 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 1,396 t | 2,385 t | 989.21 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Benin or Ethiopia PDR?
- Benin, at 2,489 t against 2,299 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Benin and Ethiopia PDR?
- 190 t, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Benin and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Benin ranks 52nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).