Bhutan vs Dominica: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Bhutan
- Dominica
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 20.07 t against 19.41 t in Dominica, a difference of 0.66 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 156th and Dominica ranks 157th of 201 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29.62 t | 5.8 t | 23.82 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 29.62 t | 5.8 t | 23.82 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 29.62 t | 6.38 t | 23.24 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 29.62 t | 6.52 t | 23.1 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 29.62 t | 13.53 t | 16.09 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 29.62 t | 19.41 t | 10.21 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 21.49 t | 19.41 t | 2.09 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Bhutan or Dominica?
- Bhutan, at 20.07 t against 19.41 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Bhutan and Dominica?
- 0.66 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Dominica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Dominica rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Bhutan ranks 156th and Dominica ranks 157th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).