Bhutan vs Eswatini: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Bhutan
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 32.5 t against 20.07 t in Bhutan, a difference of 12.43 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.6 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 143rd and Eswatini ranks 140th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29.62 t | 15.16 t | 14.45 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 29.62 t | 21.04 t | 8.58 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 29.62 t | 32.02 t | 2.4 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 29.62 t | 34.32 t | 4.7 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 29.62 t | 20.25 t | 9.37 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 29.62 t | 29.11 t | 0.5073 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 21.49 t | 33.46 t | 11.97 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Bhutan or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 32.5 t against 20.07 t in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Bhutan and Eswatini?
- 12.43 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Eswatini rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Bhutan ranks 143rd and Eswatini ranks 140th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).