Bhutan vs Luxembourg: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Bhutan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 30.77 t against 20.07 t in Bhutan, a difference of 10.7 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.5 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 156th and Luxembourg ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.62 t | 28.6 t | 1.02 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 29.62 t | 38.82 t | 9.2 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 21.49 t | 30.77 t | 9.27 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Bhutan or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 30.77 t against 20.07 t in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Bhutan and Luxembourg?
- 10.7 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Luxembourg rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Bhutan ranks 156th and Luxembourg ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).