Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- New Zealand
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 254.06 t against 248.5 t in New Zealand, a difference of 5.56 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and New Zealand ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 401.6 t | 407.87 t | 6.28 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 437.38 t | 436.67 t | 0.7136 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 382.31 t | 402.71 t | 20.4 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 324.3 t | 269.59 t | 54.71 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Zealand?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 254.06 t against 248.5 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
- 5.56 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and New Zealand ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).