Burkina Faso vs Latvia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Burkina Faso
- Latvia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 1,235 t against 1,197 t in Latvia, a difference of 38 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 75th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 882.79 t | 2,326 t | 1,443 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1,235 t | 1,541 t | 305.2 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1,436 t | 1,426 t | 10.53 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 1,197 t | 1,249 t | 52.7 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Burkina Faso or Latvia?
- Burkina Faso, at 1,235 t against 1,197 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 38 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Latvia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Burkina Faso ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 75th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).