Burundi vs Senegal: Seed — Cropland potassium

Burundi
1,500 t
in 2023
Senegal
1,451 t
in 2023
Burundi rank
75th
Senegal rank
78th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Burundi
  • Senegal
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 1,500 t against 1,451 t in Senegal, a difference of 49 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.

Burundi ranks 75th and Senegal ranks 78th of 201 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 416.39 t 1,620 t 1,204 t Senegal
1970s 467.32 t 2,116 t 1,649 t Senegal
1980s 483.54 t 2,048 t 1,565 t Senegal
1990s 501.23 t 1,850 t 1,348 t Senegal
2000s 372.81 t 1,776 t 1,403 t Senegal
2010s 576.49 t 1,362 t 785.42 t Senegal
2020s 1,480 t 1,957 t 477.72 t Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Burundi or Senegal?
Burundi, at 1,500 t against 1,451 t in Senegal as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Burundi and Senegal?
49 t, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Senegal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Senegal rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Burundi ranks 75th and Senegal ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).