Cabo Verde vs Dominica: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Cabo Verde
- Dominica
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 26.37 t against 19.41 t in Dominica, a difference of 6.96 t.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.4 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 155th and Dominica ranks 157th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 6 and Dominica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.79 t | 5.8 t | 2.99 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1970s | 3.96 t | 5.8 t | 1.84 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 29.01 t | 6.38 t | 22.63 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1990s | 36.92 t | 6.52 t | 30.4 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 26.37 t | 13.53 t | 12.85 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 31.47 t | 19.41 t | 12.06 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 26.37 t | 19.41 t | 6.97 t | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Cabo Verde or Dominica?
- Cabo Verde, at 26.37 t against 19.41 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Cabo Verde and Dominica?
- 6.96 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Dominica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Dominica rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Cabo Verde ranks 155th and Dominica ranks 157th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).