Cabo Verde vs Luxembourg: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Cabo Verde
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 30.77 t against 26.37 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 4.4 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 155th and Luxembourg ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.37 t | 28.6 t | 2.23 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 31.47 t | 38.82 t | 7.35 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 26.37 t | 30.77 t | 4.4 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Cabo Verde or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 30.77 t against 26.37 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Cabo Verde and Luxembourg?
- 4.4 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Luxembourg rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Cabo Verde ranks 155th and Luxembourg ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).