Canada vs Myanmar: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- Myanmar
How they compare
Canada currently reports 16,778 t against 10,379 t in Myanmar, a difference of 6,399 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.6 times Myanmar's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 11th and Myanmar ranks 14th of 201 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,817 t | 6,055 t | 4,761 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 10,522 t | 6,269 t | 4,254 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 12,425 t | 6,263 t | 6,162 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 13,575 t | 7,197 t | 6,379 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 15,897 t | 9,493 t | 6,404 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 16,121 t | 10,621 t | 5,499 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 16,921 t | 10,418 t | 6,503 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Canada or Myanmar?
- Canada, at 16,778 t against 10,379 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Canada and Myanmar?
- 6,399 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Myanmar rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 11th and Myanmar ranks 14th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).