Canada vs Ukraine: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 44,342 t against 16,778 t in Canada, a difference of 27,564 t.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 2.6 times Canada's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 8th of 201 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,815 t | 41,009 t | 27,193 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 15,897 t | 42,435 t | 26,539 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 16,121 t | 47,133 t | 31,012 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 16,921 t | 44,976 t | 28,055 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Canada or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 44,342 t against 16,778 t in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Canada and Ukraine?
- 27,564 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Ukraine rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 8th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).