Central African Republic vs Norway: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Central African Republic
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 348.61 t against 342.14 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 6.47 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 105th and Norway ranks 104th of 186 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 236.44 t | 926.68 t | 690.24 t | Norway |
| 1970s | 270.22 t | 689.51 t | 419.29 t | Norway |
| 1980s | 218.48 t | 709.72 t | 491.23 t | Norway |
| 1990s | 251.07 t | 665.4 t | 414.33 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 313.94 t | 526.82 t | 212.88 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 342.14 t | 500.74 t | 158.6 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 342.14 t | 422.37 t | 80.23 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Central African Republic or Norway?
- Norway, at 348.61 t against 342.14 t in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Central African Republic and Norway?
- 6.47 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Norway rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Central African Republic ranks 105th and Norway ranks 104th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).