Central America vs Thailand: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Central America
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 6,357 t against 5,473 t in Central America, a difference of 884 t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.2 times Central America's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central America ahead.
Central America ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 28th of 32 groups.
Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,187 t | 4,621 t | 1,567 t | Central America |
| 1970s | 6,343 t | 5,109 t | 1,234 t | Central America |
| 1980s | 6,916 t | 5,609 t | 1,308 t | Central America |
| 1990s | 6,454 t | 5,414 t | 1,040 t | Central America |
| 2000s | 6,188 t | 5,507 t | 680.7 t | Central America |
| 2010s | 6,134 t | 5,584 t | 550.81 t | Central America |
| 2020s | 6,180 t | 6,043 t | 136.77 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Central America or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 6,357 t against 5,473 t in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Central America and Thailand?
- 884 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Thailand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Thailand rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Central America ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 28th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).