Central America vs Uzbekistan: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Central America
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 5,795 t against 5,473 t in Central America, a difference of 322 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Central America's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central America ahead.
Central America ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 25th of 38 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,464 t | 3,838 t | 2,626 t | Central America |
| 2000s | 6,188 t | 3,613 t | 2,575 t | Central America |
| 2010s | 6,134 t | 6,599 t | 464.39 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 6,180 t | 5,757 t | 422.36 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Central America or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 5,795 t against 5,473 t in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Central America and Uzbekistan?
- 322 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Uzbekistan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Central America ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 25th of 38 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).