Chile vs Portugal: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Chile
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 387.37 t against 374.06 t in Chile, a difference of 13.31 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.
Chile ranks 113th and Portugal ranks 112th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,560 t | 1,875 t | 315.63 t | Portugal |
| 1970s | 1,534 t | 1,761 t | 226.95 t | Portugal |
| 1980s | 1,307 t | 1,619 t | 311.35 t | Portugal |
| 1990s | 1,061 t | 1,151 t | 90.75 t | Portugal |
| 2000s | 924.19 t | 636.11 t | 288.07 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 691.36 t | 620.58 t | 70.78 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 441.17 t | 456.99 t | 15.82 t | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Chile or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 387.37 t against 374.06 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Chile and Portugal?
- 13.31 t, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Portugal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Portugal rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Chile ranks 113th and Portugal ranks 112th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).