Chile vs Saudi Arabia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Chile
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 459.09 t against 374.06 t in Chile, a difference of 85.03 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 113th and Saudi Arabia ranks 110th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,560 t | 85.41 t | 1,474 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 1,534 t | 80.99 t | 1,453 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 1,307 t | 373.26 t | 934.09 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 1,061 t | 648.87 t | 411.64 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 924.19 t | 546.34 t | 377.85 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 691.36 t | 350.22 t | 341.14 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 441.17 t | 431.55 t | 9.62 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Chile or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 459.09 t against 374.06 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Chile and Saudi Arabia?
- 85.03 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Saudi Arabia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Chile ranks 113th and Saudi Arabia ranks 110th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).